PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-90.61%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-88.70%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
59.04%
Positive EBIT growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-123.76%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
27.71%
Positive net income growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
15.68%
Positive EPS growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.68%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-14.33%
Share reduction while FYB.DE is at 7.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-14.33%
Reduced diluted shares while FYB.DE is at 7.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-80.66%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-94.48%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-95.67%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-368.64%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
79.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
29.94%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of FYB.DE's 36.58%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.80%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 569.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-94.50%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 526.21%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.25%
Firm’s AR is declining while FYB.DE shows 39.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
27.43%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. FYB.DE's 354.82%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
13.58%
Asset growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 6.45%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-77.00%
We have a declining book value while FYB.DE shows 6.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
13.44%
We have some new debt while FYB.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.89%
We cut SG&A while FYB.DE invests at 15.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.