PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
139.37%
Revenue growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 59.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
285.76%
Gross profit growth under 50% of FYB.DE's 577.46%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
83.62%
Positive EBIT growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
206.72%
Operating income growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 70.54%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
39.75%
Positive net income growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
39.73%
Positive EPS growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
39.73%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while FYB.DE is at 2.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.71%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-86.35%
Negative 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 52.04%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-86.04%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 60.89%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FYB.DE stands at 172.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-182.37%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FYB.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
49.56%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FYB.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-1616.04%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
61.76%
Equity/share CAGR of 61.76% while FYB.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
-103.66%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 442.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-107.34%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FYB.DE is at 415.94%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.11%
Our AR growth while FYB.DE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.46%
We show growth while FYB.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
50.26%
Positive asset growth while FYB.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-248.65%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
45.18%
We have some new debt while FYB.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.44%
We cut SG&A while FYB.DE invests at 15.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13