PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
139.37%
Positive revenue growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
285.76%
Positive gross profit growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
83.62%
Positive EBIT growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
206.72%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 115.22%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
39.75%
Positive net income growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
39.73%
Positive EPS growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
39.73%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while PGN.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.71%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PGN.DE stands at 24.78%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-86.35%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-86.04%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PGN.DE stands at 8.55%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PGN.DE is at 3471.07%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PGN.DE stands at 23.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-182.37%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
49.56%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PGN.DE's 92.81%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-1616.04%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
61.76%
Positive growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-103.66%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-107.34%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.11%
AR growth well above PGN.DE's 28.37%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1.46%
We show growth while PGN.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
50.26%
Positive asset growth while PGN.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-248.65%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
45.18%
We have some new debt while PGN.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.44%
We cut SG&A while PGN.DE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.