PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.83%
Negative revenue growth while PGN.DE stands at 14.87%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
176.38%
Positive gross profit growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-34.51%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-34.40%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-34.26%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-33.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-33.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while PGN.DE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.92%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-117.68%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
192.25%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
250.44%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PGN.DE's 155.49%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
541.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PGN.DE's 87.91%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.79%
Positive OCF/share growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-86.07%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-422.31%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-2184.65%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-94.84%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
391.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to PGN.DE's 415.90%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.34%
Firm’s AR is declining while PGN.DE shows 20.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-97.41%
Inventory is declining while PGN.DE stands at 4.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-32.60%
Negative asset growth while PGN.DE invests at 5.53%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-19.80%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
2.56%
Debt shrinking faster vs. PGN.DE's 22.45%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.61%
SG&A growth well above PGN.DE's 11.86%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.