PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-62.44%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-83.77%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-86.58%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-86.58%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-178.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-183.11%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-183.11%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.00%
Share reduction while PGN.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
334.07%
OCF growth under 50% of PGN.DE's 769.45%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
222.11%
FCF growth under 50% of PGN.DE's 920.13%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
6.27%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-51.03%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-62.10%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.13%
Below 50% of PGN.DE's 111.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
0.05%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PGN.DE's 217.28%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-319.90%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-219.22%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-100.53%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
431.58%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
11.20%
Positive short-term equity growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.51%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-84.52%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-7.39%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-35.34%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
74.13%
We have some new debt while PGN.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.06%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.