PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
94.44%
Positive revenue growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-96.70%
Negative gross profit growth while PGN.DE is at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
129.99%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 31.89%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
107.73%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 17.13%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
86.70%
Net income growth under 50% of PGN.DE's 234.41%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
86.54%
EPS growth under 50% of PGN.DE's 235.29%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
86.54%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PGN.DE's 235.29%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.13%
Share reduction while PGN.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.13%
Reduced diluted shares while PGN.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.75%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-88.61%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
204.00%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PGN.DE's 101.24%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
0.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
186.06%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PGN.DE's 105.54%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.95%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PGN.DE is at 85.47%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-43.18%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-125.79%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PGN.DE is at 118.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
89.36%
Below 50% of PGN.DE's 219.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
88.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of PGN.DE's 130.94%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.73%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-81.71%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.48%
Firm’s AR is declining while PGN.DE shows 13.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-20.67%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-22.12%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
34.42%
Under 50% of PGN.DE's 146.22%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
6.53%
We have some new debt while PGN.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.53%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.