PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-32.17%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
1528.49%
Positive gross profit growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-435.07%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
638.87%
Positive operating income growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-325.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-204.02%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-204.02%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
40.18%
Share change of 40.18% while PGN.DE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
40.18%
Diluted share change of 40.18% while PGN.DE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
252.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PGN.DE's 85.54%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-65.19%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
174.78%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
159.08%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-71.71%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PGN.DE is at 96.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-51.36%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-1010.69%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
67.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
36.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
290.39%
Positive growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-92.27%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-77.43%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.97%
Firm’s AR is declining while PGN.DE shows 15.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-36.57%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
5.43%
Positive asset growth while PGN.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-11.18%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
16.50%
We have some new debt while PGN.DE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.32%
We cut SG&A while PGN.DE invests at 56.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.