PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-90.61%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-88.70%
Negative gross profit growth while PGN.DE is at 286.55%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
59.04%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 30.61%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
-123.76%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
27.71%
Positive net income growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
15.68%
Positive EPS growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.68%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-14.33%
Share reduction while PGN.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-14.33%
Reduced diluted shares while PGN.DE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while PGN.DE is at 553.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while PGN.DE is at 203.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-80.66%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PGN.DE stands at 71.91%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-94.48%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-95.67%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PGN.DE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PGN.DE is at 112.39%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-368.64%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
79.49%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of PGN.DE's 94.49%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
29.94%
Below 50% of PGN.DE's 86.69%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.80%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-94.50%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.25%
Firm’s AR is declining while PGN.DE shows 4.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
27.43%
We show growth while PGN.DE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
13.58%
Positive asset growth while PGN.DE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-77.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
13.44%
Debt growth far above PGN.DE's 1.04%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.89%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.