1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-58.30%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-131.27%
Negative gross profit growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 61.94%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-103.92%
Negative EBIT growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 124.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-103.92%
Negative operating income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 131.58%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-107.05%
Negative net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 60.80%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-107.03%
Negative EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 60.81%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-107.03%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 60.81%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.60%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-16.60%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 40.70%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-16.60%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 14.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.11%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-114.11%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-114.11%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.32%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.