1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
Negative gross profit growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 61.94%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
0.00%
EBIT growth below 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 124.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-13.47%
Negative operating income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 131.58%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.57%
Negative EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 60.81%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-0.57%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 60.81%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
161.18%
OCF growth at 50-75% of VPLAY-B.ST's 224.40%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
102.27%
FCF growth under 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 220.97%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
66.79%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
66.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 40.70%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
66.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 14.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.22%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-128.22%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-128.22%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.43%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.