PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
160.23%
Positive revenue growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-726.98%
Negative gross profit growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 61.94%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-717.40%
Negative EBIT growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 124.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-667.74%
Negative operating income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 131.58%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-388.30%
Negative net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 60.80%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-387.57%
Negative EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 60.81%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-387.57%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 60.81%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while VPLAY-B.ST is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117.02%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
117.02%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 40.70%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
117.02%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 14.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.89%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-168.89%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-168.89%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while VPLAY-B.ST shows 488.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-57.70%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
14.68%
Asset growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 5.90%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-108.51%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
47.36%
We have some new debt while VPLAY-B.ST reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
174.48%
We expand SG&A while VPLAY-B.ST cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.