PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-69.22%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
51.02%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of VPLAY-B.ST's 61.94%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
-579.48%
Negative EBIT growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 124.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
42.36%
Operating income growth under 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 131.58%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-543.23%
Negative net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 60.80%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-548.72%
Negative EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 60.81%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-548.72%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 60.81%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.79%
OCF growth under 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 224.40%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-96.42%
Negative FCF growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 220.97%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-54.47%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-54.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 40.70%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-54.47%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 14.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-265.42%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-265.42%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-265.42%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.16%
Firm’s AR is declining while VPLAY-B.ST shows 488.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
340.13%
We show growth while VPLAY-B.ST is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-8.06%
Negative asset growth while VPLAY-B.ST invests at 5.90%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-52.70%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
19.06%
We have some new debt while VPLAY-B.ST reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.15%
We expand SG&A while VPLAY-B.ST cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.