PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
53.64%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 15.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-168.68%
Negative gross profit growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 24.32%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-7.40%
Negative EBIT growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 49.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-7.39%
Negative operating income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 69.97%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-8.95%
Negative net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 73.80%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.00%
Share count expansion well above VPLAY-B.ST's 0.24%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
10.00%
Slight or no buyback while VPLAY-B.ST is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
745.08%
10Y CAGR of 745.08% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
913.34%
5Y CAGR of 913.34% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
185.69%
3Y CAGR of 185.69% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
308.88%
OCF/share CAGR of 308.88% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
74.90%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 74.90% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-580.12%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-3303.26%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-743.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2563.80%
Equity/share CAGR of 2563.80% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
187.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 187.23% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.45%
AR growth of 123.45% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
89.51%
Inventory growth of 89.51% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
6.77%
Asset growth of 6.77% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-28.44%
We have a declining book value while VPLAY-B.ST shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
67.81%
Debt growth of 67.81% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.07%
We cut SG&A while VPLAY-B.ST invests at 7.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.