PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.19%
Negative revenue growth while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 9.74%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
146.58%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 29.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
63.31%
Positive EBIT growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
63.31%
Positive operating income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
75.50%
Positive net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
75.28%
Positive EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
75.28%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while VPLAY-B.ST is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
465.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 4.91%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
239.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 4.91%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-15.87%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 4.91%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.55%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-86.07%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-257.95%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-459.79%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-243.83%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1144.44%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 38.93%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
219.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 38.93%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.98%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
530.87%
We show growth while VPLAY-B.ST is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-22.26%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-11.69%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-46.94%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.84%
We cut SG&A while VPLAY-B.ST invests at 23.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.