PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-62.44%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-83.77%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-86.58%
Negative EBIT growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 1084.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-86.58%
Negative operating income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 1084.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-178.45%
Negative net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 1483.65%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-183.11%
Negative EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 1504.29%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-183.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 1510.39%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Share reduction while VPLAY-B.ST is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
334.07%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 249.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
222.11%
FCF growth similar to VPLAY-B.ST's 234.59%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
6.27%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-51.03%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-62.10%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.13%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of VPLAY-B.ST's 29.58%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
0.05%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 29.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-319.90%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is at 658.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-219.22%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is 658.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is 658.32%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
431.58%
Equity/share CAGR of 431.58% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
11.20%
Equity/share CAGR of 11.20% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.51%
Firm’s AR is declining while VPLAY-B.ST shows 3.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-84.52%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-7.39%
Negative asset growth while VPLAY-B.ST invests at 11.90%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-35.34%
We have a declining book value while VPLAY-B.ST shows 141.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
74.13%
We have some new debt while VPLAY-B.ST reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.06%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.