PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.00 (0.00%)
1.17 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
166 / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-39.55%
Negative revenue growth while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 12.48%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
2.50%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 8.79%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
33.44%
Positive EBIT growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
33.44%
Positive operating income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
32.34%
Positive net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
42.86%
Positive EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
42.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
20.00%
Share count expansion well above VPLAY-B.ST's 8.39%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
20.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above VPLAY-B.ST's 8.35%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.06%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-63.81%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-85.05%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.71%
Below 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 14.56%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-8.28%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 14.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-347.96%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-432.19%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-253.07%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 409.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-79.36%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 409.95%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.39%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6903.06%
We show growth while VPLAY-B.ST is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
133.54%
Positive asset growth while VPLAY-B.ST is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-28.93%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
103.74%
We have some new debt while VPLAY-B.ST reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.66%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.