PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
601.18%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 3.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
411.37%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 8.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
26.24%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 3.68%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
26.24%
Positive operating income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.25%
Positive net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.00%
Positive EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.83%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 6.78%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.83%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 6.75%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.65%
OCF growth under 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 306.32%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
35.15%
FCF growth under 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 273.31%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
272.26%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
717.66%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
23.05%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.19%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is at 29.29%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-28.88%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 29.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-194.37%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
42.95%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
61.06%
Positive short-term CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.36%
Equity/share CAGR of 96.36% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-76.79%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.63%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-85.68%
Inventory is declining while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 3.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-37.06%
Negative asset growth while VPLAY-B.ST invests at 3.26%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.82%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-13.05%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
SG&A declining or stable vs. VPLAY-B.ST's 5.68%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.