PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.85%
Negative revenue growth while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 16.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
115.90%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 14.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
110.47%
Positive EBIT growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
110.47%
Positive operating income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
103.34%
Positive net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
102.75%
Positive EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
102.75%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
20.03%
Share count expansion well above VPLAY-B.ST's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
20.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above VPLAY-B.ST's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
452.94%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-17.79%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-34.57%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.51%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-34.82%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-94.74%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-95.21%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
101.09%
Positive short-term CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.62%
Below 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 1128.14%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-63.99%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 1128.14%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.69%
Our AR growth while VPLAY-B.ST is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-68.52%
Inventory is declining while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 8.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
30.73%
Asset growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 7.83%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
13.43%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 1.40%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
57.90%
We have some new debt while VPLAY-B.ST reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
SG&A growth well above VPLAY-B.ST's 10.73%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.