PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-56.46%
Negative revenue growth while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 12.06%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-119.46%
Negative gross profit growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 34.47%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1378.72%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1378.76%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-3782.79%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-4039.39%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-4039.39%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-8.36%
Share reduction while VPLAY-B.ST is at 0.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-8.33%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.79%
OCF growth under 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 149.14%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
17.75%
FCF growth under 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 142.84%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
31.37%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-53.15%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-55.05%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.11%
Positive OCF/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
421.06%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-205.60%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
3.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
67.24%
Positive short-term CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.79%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-65.92%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 469.63%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while VPLAY-B.ST shows 44.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-29.33%
Inventory is declining while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 8.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
42.58%
Asset growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 11.21%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-25.14%
We have a declining book value while VPLAY-B.ST shows 2.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
122.78%
We have some new debt while VPLAY-B.ST reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.97%
We cut SG&A while VPLAY-B.ST invests at 5.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.