PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.82%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 17.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
422.90%
Positive gross profit growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-81.36%
Negative EBIT growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 70.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-81.36%
Negative operating income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 70.76%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-91.09%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-84.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-84.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
4.18%
Share count expansion well above VPLAY-B.ST's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
4.18%
Diluted share count expanding well above VPLAY-B.ST's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
212.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 1.16%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-56.39%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 1.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-44.81%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.82%
Positive OCF/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
400.17%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-487.40%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-339.14%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-145.27%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.62%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 1210.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-89.93%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 843.45%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.79%
AR growth well above VPLAY-B.ST's 45.12%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
27.02%
Inventory growth well above VPLAY-B.ST's 12.46%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-3.64%
Negative asset growth while VPLAY-B.ST invests at 4.93%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-75.81%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.73%
Debt shrinking faster vs. VPLAY-B.ST's 13.77%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.68%
SG&A growth well above VPLAY-B.ST's 14.40%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.