PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
94.44%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 1.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-96.70%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
129.99%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 5.84%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
107.73%
Operating income growth under 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 1892.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
86.70%
Positive net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
86.54%
Positive EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
86.54%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.13%
Share reduction while VPLAY-B.ST is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.13%
Reduced diluted shares while VPLAY-B.ST is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.75%
Negative OCF growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 131.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-88.61%
Negative FCF growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 125.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
204.00%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 5.30%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
0.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 5.30%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
186.06%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 50.62%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.95%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-43.18%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-125.79%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
89.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
88.27%
Positive short-term CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-81.71%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.48%
Firm’s AR is declining while VPLAY-B.ST shows 8.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-20.67%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-22.12%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
34.42%
Positive BV/share change while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
6.53%
We have some new debt while VPLAY-B.ST reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.53%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13