PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-32.17%
Negative revenue growth while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 8.09%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
1528.49%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 53.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-435.07%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
638.87%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 37.36%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-325.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-204.02%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-204.02%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
40.18%
Slight or no buybacks while VPLAY-B.ST is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
40.18%
Diluted share change of 40.18% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
252.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 6.25%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-65.19%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 6.25%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
174.78%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 43.89%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
159.08%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-71.71%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-51.36%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-1010.69%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
67.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
36.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
290.39%
Positive growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-92.27%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-77.43%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.97%
Firm’s AR is declining while VPLAY-B.ST shows 47.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-36.57%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
5.43%
Asset growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 3.57%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-11.18%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
16.50%
Debt shrinking faster vs. VPLAY-B.ST's 47.05%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.32%
We cut SG&A while VPLAY-B.ST invests at 12.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.