PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-90.61%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-88.70%
Negative gross profit growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 68.35%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
59.04%
EBIT growth 75-90% of VPLAY-B.ST's 78.23%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
-123.76%
Negative operating income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 79.25%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
27.71%
Positive net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
15.68%
Positive EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.68%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-14.33%
Share reduction while VPLAY-B.ST is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-14.33%
Reduced diluted shares while VPLAY-B.ST is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 140.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 139.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-80.66%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 2.87%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-94.48%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-95.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 45.49%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-368.64%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
79.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
29.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.80%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 152.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-94.50%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.25%
Firm’s AR is declining while VPLAY-B.ST shows 2.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
27.43%
We show growth while VPLAY-B.ST is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
13.58%
Asset growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 6.88%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-77.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
13.44%
We have some new debt while VPLAY-B.ST reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.89%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.