PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
139.37%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 9.63%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
285.76%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 72.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
83.62%
EBIT growth below 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 416.36%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
206.72%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 2.13%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
39.75%
Positive net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
39.73%
Positive EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
39.73%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while VPLAY-B.ST is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.71%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 3.84%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-86.35%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-86.04%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST stands at 34.49%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-182.37%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
49.56%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VPLAY-B.ST is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-1616.04%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
61.76%
Below 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 436.05%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-103.66%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VPLAY-B.ST is at 285.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-107.34%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.11%
AR growth of 72.11% while VPLAY-B.ST is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
1.46%
We show growth while VPLAY-B.ST is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
50.26%
Asset growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 4.13%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-248.65%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
45.18%
We have some new debt while VPLAY-B.ST reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.44%
We cut SG&A while VPLAY-B.ST invests at 12.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.