PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.50%
Revenue decline while AAG.DE shows 10.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
61.22%
Cost growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 20.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-120.10%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-123.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.97%
Other expenses reduction while AAG.DE shows 8.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.29%
Operating expenses growth while AAG.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
46.80%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 11.89%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-9.75%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-76.46%
D&A reduction while AAG.DE shows 4.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-134.28%
EBITDA decline while AAG.DE shows 3.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-140.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-208.30%
Operating income decline while AAG.DE shows 3.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-228.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.03%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AAG.DE's 62.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-208.19%
Pre-tax income decline while AAG.DE shows 5.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-228.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-99.15%
Tax expense reduction while AAG.DE shows 8.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-399.22%
Net income decline while AAG.DE shows 4.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-454.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-400.00%
EPS decline while AAG.DE shows 3.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-400.00%
Diluted EPS decline while AAG.DE shows 3.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.