1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
139.37%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x FYB.DE's 59.08%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
54.65%
Cost growth above 1.5x FYB.DE's 19.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
285.76%
Gross profit growth below 50% of FYB.DE's 577.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
61.15%
Margin expansion below 50% of FYB.DE's 325.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.44%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
22.04%
Total costs growth while FYB.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.44%
D&A reduction while FYB.DE shows 1749.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
69.31%
EBITDA growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
87.18%
EBITDA margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
206.72%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x FYB.DE's 70.54%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
144.58%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x FYB.DE's 81.48%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-41.43%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
39.74%
Pre-tax income growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
74.83%
Pre-tax margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8050.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
39.75%
Net income growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
74.83%
Net margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
39.73%
EPS growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
39.73%
Diluted EPS growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.00%
Share count reduction while FYB.DE shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.