PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.04%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-16.96%
Cost reduction while FYB.DE shows 7.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1.10%
Positive growth while FYB.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-31.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.44%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-30.36%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
102.90%
Interest expense change of 102.90% while FYB.DE maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
116416.41%
D&A growth while FYB.DE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1158.32%
EBITDA growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1511.76%
EBITDA margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-342.17%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-489.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-168.30%
Other expenses reduction while FYB.DE shows 545.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
154.13%
Pre-tax income growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
172.21%
Pre-tax margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-300.00%
Tax expense reduction while FYB.DE shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
159.60%
Net income growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
179.50%
Net margin growth while FYB.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
154.23%
EPS change of 154.23% while FYB.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
154.23%
Diluted EPS change of 154.23% while FYB.DE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
10.00%
Share count change of 10.00% while FYB.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
10.00%
Diluted share change of 10.00% while FYB.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.