PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
160.23%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PGN.DE's 6.88%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
238.52%
Cost increase while PGN.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-726.98%
Gross profit decline while PGN.DE shows 14.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-217.79%
Margin decline while PGN.DE shows 7.19% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 6.89%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
397.85%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 6.89%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
365.21%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 2.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-42.20%
Interest expense reduction while PGN.DE shows 5.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.26%
D&A growth less than half of PGN.DE's 4.51%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-767.43%
EBITDA decline while PGN.DE shows 39.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-233.33%
EBITDA margin decline while PGN.DE shows 30.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-667.74%
Operating income decline while PGN.DE shows 57.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-195.02%
Operating margin decline while PGN.DE shows 47.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
43725.97%
Other expenses growth while PGN.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-673.01%
Pre-tax income decline while PGN.DE shows 88.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-197.05%
Pre-tax margin decline while PGN.DE shows 76.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-118.11%
Tax expense reduction while PGN.DE shows 242.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-388.30%
Net income decline while PGN.DE shows 46.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.64%
Net margin decline while PGN.DE shows 37.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-387.57%
EPS decline while PGN.DE shows 42.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-387.57%
Diluted EPS decline while PGN.DE shows 42.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.00%
Share count change of 0.00% while PGN.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.