PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
40.45%
Similar revenue growth to PGN.DE's 36.98%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
-28.93%
Cost reduction while PGN.DE shows 85.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
524.52%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PGN.DE's 4.77%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
402.25%
Margin expansion while PGN.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.04%
Other expenses reduction while PGN.DE shows 11.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1740.95%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 11.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-7.99%
Total costs reduction while PGN.DE shows 43.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-51.87%
Interest expense reduction while PGN.DE shows 9.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-49.91%
D&A reduction while PGN.DE shows 34.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.07%
EBITDA growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-23.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
323.25%
Operating income growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
258.95%
Operating margin growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.33%
Other expenses growth while PGN.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
325.05%
Pre-tax income growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
260.23%
Pre-tax margin growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7901.29%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 453.75%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
181.25%
Net income growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
157.85%
Net margin growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
171.43%
EPS growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
171.43%
Diluted EPS growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.00%
Share count change of 10.00% while PGN.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
10.00%
Diluted share change of 10.00% while PGN.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.