1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.83%
Revenue decline while PGN.DE shows 14.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-52.62%
Cost reduction while PGN.DE shows 64.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
176.38%
Positive growth while PGN.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
210.43%
Margin expansion while PGN.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while PGN.DE shows 17.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
902.02%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 17.33%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-19.12%
Total costs reduction while PGN.DE shows 37.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while PGN.DE shows 3.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-44.35%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-105.37%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-107.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
99.99%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 19.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-34.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
114.26%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of PGN.DE's 158.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-34.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.00%
Share count increase while PGN.DE reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.