PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
601.18%
Positive growth while PGN.DE shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
709.20%
Cost increase while PGN.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
411.37%
Positive growth while PGN.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-27.07%
Margin decline while PGN.DE shows 10.12% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.34%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 9.96%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
307.26%
Total costs growth while PGN.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.47%
D&A growth above 1.5x PGN.DE's 8.22%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
82.42%
EBITDA growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
97.49%
EBITDA margin growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.24%
Operating income growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.48%
Operating margin growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-20.03%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
26.08%
Pre-tax income growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.46%
Pre-tax margin growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-95.68%
Tax expense reduction while PGN.DE shows 636.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
23.25%
Net income growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.05%
Net margin growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
EPS growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.83%
Share count change of 0.83% while PGN.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.83%
Diluted share change of 0.83% while PGN.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.