PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.85%
Revenue decline while PGN.DE shows 15.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-56.44%
Cost reduction while PGN.DE shows 18.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
115.90%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PGN.DE's 12.94%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
142.18%
Margin expansion while PGN.DE shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.15%
Operating expenses growth while PGN.DE reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.31%
Total costs reduction while PGN.DE shows 1.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1933.14%
D&A growth while PGN.DE reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1529.09%
EBITDA growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1703.08%
EBITDA margin growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
110.47%
Operating income growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
111.75%
Operating margin growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.17%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
109.84%
Pre-tax income growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
111.04%
Pre-tax margin growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
187373.33%
Tax expense growth while PGN.DE reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
103.34%
Similar net income growth to PGN.DE's 128.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
103.75%
Similar net margin growth to PGN.DE's 124.64%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
102.75%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PGN.DE's 71.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
102.75%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PGN.DE's 71.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
20.03%
Share count change of 20.03% while PGN.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
20.00%
Diluted share change of 20.00% while PGN.DE is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.