PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-90.61%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-91.44%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-88.70%
Gross profit decline while PGN.DE shows 286.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
20.36%
Margin expansion below 50% of PGN.DE's 340.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while PGN.DE shows 2655.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.89%
Operating expenses reduction while PGN.DE shows 172.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-82.18%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while PGN.DE shows 1.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-36.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
18.05%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x PGN.DE's 6.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-772.52%
EBITDA margin decline while PGN.DE shows 21.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-123.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-352.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
75.12%
Other expenses growth less than half of PGN.DE's 329.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
26.34%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of PGN.DE's 41.58%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-684.25%
Pre-tax margin decline while PGN.DE shows 33.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-99.99%
Tax expense reduction while PGN.DE shows 181.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
27.71%
Net income growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-669.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
15.68%
EPS growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.68%
Diluted EPS growth while PGN.DE declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.33%
Share count reduction while PGN.DE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-14.33%
Diluted share reduction while PGN.DE shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.