1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.82%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 17.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
-75.61%
Cost reduction while VPLAY-B.ST shows 23.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
422.90%
Positive growth while VPLAY-B.ST shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
360.78%
Margin expansion while VPLAY-B.ST shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while VPLAY-B.ST shows 907.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
4389.34%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 97.29%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
37.76%
Similar total costs growth to VPLAY-B.ST's 35.72%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.75%
D&A growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 10.45%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-21.76%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.36%
Operating income decline while VPLAY-B.ST shows 70.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.46%
Operating margin decline while VPLAY-B.ST shows 75.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.25%
Other expenses growth while VPLAY-B.ST reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-80.19%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-45.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
105.56%
Tax expense growth while VPLAY-B.ST reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-91.09%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-54.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-84.62%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-84.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.18%
Share count reduction below 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
4.18%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.