PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Pantaflix AG (PAL.DE)
1.170.03 (-2.50%)
1.14 - 1.17
1.10 - 1.60
14.0K / 2.1K (Avg.)
-9.00 | -0.13
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
94.44%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 1.19%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
657.57%
Cost growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 1.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-96.70%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-98.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.95%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
29.95%
Total costs growth while VPLAY-B.ST reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.27%
D&A growth above 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 2.70%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
445.72%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 8.76%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
180.66%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x VPLAY-B.ST's 9.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
107.73%
Operating income growth below 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 1892.54%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
103.97%
Operating margin growth below 50% of VPLAY-B.ST's 1871.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6919.23%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
84.28%
Pre-tax income growth while VPLAY-B.ST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
91.91%
Pre-tax margin growth while VPLAY-B.ST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4453.22%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
86.70%
Net income growth while VPLAY-B.ST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
93.16%
Net margin growth while VPLAY-B.ST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.54%
EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.54%
Diluted EPS growth while VPLAY-B.ST declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while VPLAY-B.ST shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.13%
Diluted share reduction while VPLAY-B.ST shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.