0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
30.12%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of PLUG's 280.72%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.12%
Below half of PLUG's 280.72%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-56.88%
Receivables growth less than half of PLUG's 246.27%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
12.80%
Inventory growth above 1.5x PLUG's 4.65%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.79%
Below half of PLUG's 51.30%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
978.33%
≥ 1.5x PLUG's 6.78%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.21%
Above 1.5x PLUG's -7.48%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
203.65%
≥ 1.5x PLUG's 1.39%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.81%
≥ 1.5x PLUG's 20.61%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
2.23%
Less than half of PLUG's 37.31%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
262.15%
Exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 33.67%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
31.36%
50-75% of PLUG's 53.70%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.07%
Less than half of PLUG's 42.97%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2832.58%
Above 1.5x PLUG's 35.72%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
136.88%
Above 1.5x PLUG's 44.98%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.03%
Below half PLUG's -3.67%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
147.75%
Above 1.5x PLUG's 39.56%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.73%
Below half PLUG's -11.72%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
35.81%
≥ 1.5x PLUG's 20.61%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15122.66%
Above 1.5x PLUG's 47.73%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
59.32%
1.25-1.5x PLUG's 40.27%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.
