0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
103.33%
Cash & equivalents growing 103.33% while SLDP's declined -10.88%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.33%
Below half of SLDP's -4.16%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-11.84%
Receivables growth less than half of SLDP's -100.00%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
7.77%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.78%
Below half of SLDP's -3.85%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-4.62%
≥ 1.5x SLDP's -2.72%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.05%
Below half of SLDP's -147.82%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.48%
Below half of SLDP's -5.10%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
103.19%
Less than half of SLDP's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
13.08%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both SLDP and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Less than half of SLDP's 257.29%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-4.47%
Less than half of SLDP's 18.89%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Similar yoy changes to SLDP's -100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in other LT liabilities.
-100.00%
Above 1.5x SLDP's -35.79%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.47%
Less than half of SLDP's -33.45%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.16%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.16%
Below half SLDP's -12.94%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
102.04%
Above 1.5x SLDP's 6.13%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1228.92%
Below half SLDP's -6.67%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.48%
Below half SLDP's -5.10%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.03%
Less than half of SLDP's -2.97%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-32.72%
Less than half of SLDP's 14.19%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
