0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
23.51%
Cash & equivalents growing 23.51% while SLDP's declined -10.88%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.51%
Below half of SLDP's -4.16%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-0.38%
Receivables growth less than half of SLDP's -100.00%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-7.37%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.70%
Below half of SLDP's -3.85%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-4.87%
≥ 1.5x SLDP's -2.72%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.25%
Below half of SLDP's -147.82%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.51%
Below half of SLDP's -5.10%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
8.23%
Less than half of SLDP's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both SLDP and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-71.21%
Less than half of SLDP's 257.29%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-20.97%
Less than half of SLDP's 18.89%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.41%
Less than half of SLDP's -100.00%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-7.00%
Less than half of SLDP's -35.79%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.52%
50-75% of SLDP's -33.45%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a lower yoy liability increase.
2.25%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.13%
Below half SLDP's -12.94%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-216.87%
Less than half of SLDP's 6.13%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
100.00%
Less than half of SLDP's 1376867.44%. David Dodd notes simpler yoy equity changes vs. competitor.
16.52%
Below half SLDP's -6.67%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
4.51%
Below half SLDP's -5.10%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.69%
Above 1.5x SLDP's -2.97%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
-24.98%
Less than half of SLDP's 14.19%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
