0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
12.71%
Cash & equivalents growing 12.71% while SLDP's declined -10.88%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.71%
Below half of SLDP's -4.16%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-76.11%
Similar receivables growth to SLDP's -100.00%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
5.31%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
117.80%
Above 1.5x SLDP's 42.98%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
2.51%
Below half of SLDP's -3.85%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-3.60%
1.25-1.5x SLDP's -2.72%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a significant push to expand capacity faster than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.64%
Below half of SLDP's -147.82%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.87%
Below half of SLDP's -5.10%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-24.61%
Less than half of SLDP's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
1.48%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Both SLDP and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
10.38%
Less than half of SLDP's 257.29%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-3.17%
Less than half of SLDP's 18.89%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.80%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
100.00%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating better performance.
-100.00%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
579.53%
Less than half of SLDP's -100.00%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
3.56%
Less than half of SLDP's -35.79%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.15%
Less than half of SLDP's -33.45%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.58%
Below half SLDP's -12.94%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-18.61%
Less than half of SLDP's 6.13%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.69%
Below half SLDP's -6.67%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.87%
Below half SLDP's -5.10%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.08%
Above 1.5x SLDP's -2.97%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
-65.62%
Less than half of SLDP's 14.19%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
