0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
13.75%
Cash & equivalents growing 13.75% while SLDP's declined -9.19%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.75%
Below half of SLDP's -9.19%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-63.41%
Receivables growth less than half of SLDP's 66.32%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-10.39%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
362.86%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
15.38%
Below half of SLDP's -99.54%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.43%
Below half SLDP's 19.98%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Less than half of SLDP's 30.70%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-100.00%
Less than half of SLDP's 30.70%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-100.00%
Below half of SLDP's 0.00%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
-100.00%
Less than half of SLDP's 96.05%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
110.56%
1.1-1.25x SLDP's 96.12%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm invests in intangible or other non-core areas more aggressively.
0.70%
Below half of SLDP's 2945.39%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.77%
Below half of SLDP's 164.74%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
80.93%
Above 1.5x SLDP's 27.26%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
-63.67%
50-75% of SLDP's -100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm is less reliant on near-term borrowing than competitor.
-100.00%
Below half of SLDP's 60.53%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-100.00%
Both SLDP and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
156.54%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to SLDP's zero value, indicating worse performance.
68.27%
Less than half of SLDP's -14.50%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-25.31%
50-75% of SLDP's -34.82%. Bruce Berkowitz notes less new LT debt than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Similar yoy changes to SLDP's -100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel tax deferral patterns.
365.24%
Less than half of SLDP's 10183.76%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-9.45%
Less than half of SLDP's 3672.21%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.26%
Less than half of SLDP's 905.50%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.17%
Below half SLDP's 83.84%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-7.46%
Down 5-10% yoy – moderate compression. Seth Klarman sees less intangible value from unrealized gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.03%
Below half SLDP's 132.73%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
9.77%
Below half SLDP's 164.74%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Below half SLDP's 0.00%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-13.80%
Similar yoy changes to SLDP's -14.61%. Walter Schloss notes parallel total debt strategies.
-70.45%
Less than half of SLDP's 9.10%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
