PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-103.99%
Negative net income growth while ANO.AX stands at 161.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
23.87%
Some D&A expansion while ANO.AX is negative at -8.68%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
248.93%
SBC growth of 248.93% while ANO.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
100.00%
Slight usage while ANO.AX is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth while ANO.AX is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while ANO.AX is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ANO.AX at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-235.24%
Both negative yoy, with ANO.AX at -1871.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-23.93%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ANO.AX at -36.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
32.57%
CapEx growth well above ANO.AX's 42.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while ANO.AX is 78.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
32.57%
Investing outflow well above ANO.AX's 58.69%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of ANO.AX's 177.50%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while ANO.AX is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.