0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-104.47%
Negative net income growth while ANO.AX stands at 161.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-45.70%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ANO.AX at -8.68%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-767.57%
Both negative yoy, with ANO.AX at -1871.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
49.89%
Some CFO growth while ANO.AX is negative at -36.75%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
33.22%
CapEx growth well above ANO.AX's 42.17%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while ANO.AX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while ANO.AX is 78.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
33.18%
Investing outflow well above ANO.AX's 58.69%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of ANO.AX's 177.50%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while ANO.AX is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while ANO.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.