PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-103.99%
Negative net income growth while ECL.AX stands at 104.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
23.87%
Less D&A growth vs. ECL.AX's 557.45%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
248.93%
SBC growth while ECL.AX is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
100.00%
Well above ECL.AX's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth well above ECL.AX's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above ECL.AX's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while ECL.AX is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-235.24%
Both negative yoy, with ECL.AX at -169.14%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-23.93%
Negative yoy CFO while ECL.AX is 111.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
32.57%
Some CapEx rise while ECL.AX is negative at -153.85%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while ECL.AX is 146.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
32.57%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. ECL.AX's 145.07%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while ECL.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while ECL.AX is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.