0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-45.78%
Negative net income growth while ECL.AX stands at 27.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
74.46%
Less D&A growth vs. ECL.AX's 276.19%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Well above ECL.AX's 100.00% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-100.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ECL.AX at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while ECL.AX is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Some yoy usage while ECL.AX is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-185.57%
Both negative yoy, with ECL.AX at -340.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-124.17%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ECL.AX at -89.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
74.64%
Some CapEx rise while ECL.AX is negative at -130.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13309.09%
Growth well above ECL.AX's 169.84%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
75.91%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. ECL.AX's 169.93%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while ECL.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while ECL.AX is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.