0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.77%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LBL.AX at -11.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.54%
Some yoy increase while LBL.AX is negative at -58.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
130.13%
Some CFO growth while LBL.AX is negative at -71.34%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-127.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with LBL.AX at -80.35%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.56%
Purchases growth of 96.56% while LBL.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-62.58%
We reduce yoy sales while LBL.AX is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
175.08%
We have some outflow growth while LBL.AX is negative at -123.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
130.13%
Investing outflow well above LBL.AX's 91.23%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
84.60%
Debt repayment growth of 84.60% while LBL.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while LBL.AX is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.