PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-104.47%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LBL.AX at -43.26%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-45.70%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LBL.AX at -11.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-767.57%
Both negative yoy, with LBL.AX at -58.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
49.89%
Some CFO growth while LBL.AX is negative at -71.34%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
33.22%
Some CapEx rise while LBL.AX is negative at -80.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while LBL.AX stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with LBL.AX at -123.04%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
33.18%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. LBL.AX's 91.23%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LBL.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while LBL.AX is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Similar buyback growth to LBL.AX's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.