0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-139.08%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with LBL.AX at -43.26%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-40.62%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with LBL.AX at -11.15%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Slight usage while LBL.AX is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth well above LBL.AX's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while LBL.AX is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with LBL.AX at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
128.24%
Some yoy increase while LBL.AX is negative at -58.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
129.64%
Some CFO growth while LBL.AX is negative at -71.34%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
73.21%
Some CapEx rise while LBL.AX is negative at -80.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-206.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with LBL.AX at -123.04%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
72.86%
Investing outflow well above LBL.AX's 91.23%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while LBL.AX is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while LBL.AX is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.