PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.77%
Negative yoy D&A while PLUG is 6.52%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.54%
Some yoy increase while PLUG is negative at -29.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
130.13%
Some CFO growth while PLUG is negative at -17.13%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-127.07%
Negative yoy CapEx while PLUG is 5.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.56%
Purchases growth of 96.56% while PLUG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-62.58%
Both yoy lines are negative, with PLUG at -160.54%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
175.08%
Growth of 175.08% while PLUG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
130.13%
We have mild expansions while PLUG is negative at -165.53%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
84.60%
Debt repayment growth of 84.60% while PLUG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while PLUG is 194.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.