PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.28%
Some D&A expansion while PLUG is negative at -41.13%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.51%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. PLUG's 187.21%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-92.07%
Negative yoy CFO while PLUG is 9.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.02%
Lower CapEx growth vs. PLUG's 36.73%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.24%
We reduce yoy other investing while PLUG is 63.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-92.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLUG at -98.30%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
83.01%
Debt repayment growth of 83.01% while PLUG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-73.78%
Negative yoy issuance while PLUG is 79.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.