PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.06%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PLUG at -7.41%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
16.39%
Some D&A expansion while PLUG is negative at -1.14%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
338.75%
Growth of 338.75% while PLUG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
30.09%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x PLUG's 5.30%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
21.99%
CapEx growth well above PLUG's 43.37%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.17%
Growth of 79.17% while PLUG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
30.09%
We have mild expansions while PLUG is negative at -1217.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-137.30%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PLUG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
113.13%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. PLUG's 6057307.35%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.